Hi, > > > Of course review is a good thing, and Martin's review request did > > already get a couple of suggestions for improvements. It just wasn't > > clear to me if telling the wider world is required/makes sense in this > > case, or if having it reviewed by the people who work on the area is > > enough - I think that not everyone reading kde-core-devel wants to be > > informed about every little thing. But actually, either way is fine > > for me. However, seeing that the hard feature freeze is already in > > place, it might have to wait until KDE/4.10 branches are created > > anyway. > Thank you Frank and Fredrich for the review comments, this will improve the code. In a second round it could be nice with more rewievers, and I would like to inform kde-core-devel if this is appropriated.
> > I thought we had granted an feature freeze excemption for this (or that's > what > i understood from the previous mails in this thread). > I glad that you like my new plugin and wants this include in the release. I'm currently working on fixing a bug that makes this Plugin almost unusable in suntan situations as too many files are marked as not under version control. I will try to fix this in the coming days, but I will not be able to test the result before week 47. The fix will affect only one of the public functions (beginRetrieval()), however I will make it up to someone else to decide if this is still acceptable for KDE 4.10 or if the plugin will have to wait for 4.11. BR, Martin > > Cheers, > Albert > > > > > Best regards, > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > > release-team mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team >
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
