El Dimecres, 16 de gener de 2013, a les 15:06:05, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > On Wednesday 16 January 2013 14.22.23 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i'd like everyone to comment > > > > > > 1) Drop Betas to 1 > > > > > > It doesn't seem "to me" that having extra betas gives us much > > > more > > > > > > quality, so my suggestion is to drop Beta 2 and move Beta 1 to happen > > > in > > > Beta 2 time (moving also Hard Freeze) which gives us 2 more weeks for > > > feature development > > > > > > 2) Drop RCs to 1 > > > > > > Same thing, it did not feel to me as that it gave us much, drop > > > RC2 > > > > > > and RC1 one week into the future > > > > This can only work if the quality effort starts timely (which didn't > > happen > > for 4.10, it only really got into gear for RC1, way too late). > > > > We need closer collaboration between release-team, quality team and other > > parties. Only if we're sure that that process works better, we can think > > of > > decreasing the amount of pre-releases. > > > > > 3) Increase RC time between tag and packaging > > > > > > One day between tagging and release is crazy, let's have 5/6 > > > days > > > as > > > > > > we have for the other releases > > > > Why? > > > > It's not one day, but "as soon as tarballs are happy", so flexible instead > > of "crazy short". > > Can we include this in the schedule somehow, like X:th Tagging, Y-Z Release, > or something so that everyone is clear on that sometime between Y and Z the > release is going to happen.
Agreed, if we want to be flexible, we should say so in the schedule. Cheers, Albert > > /Regards > Torgny > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
