On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Martin Gräßlin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday 19 January 2013 19:21:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> > > I think that the 4.11 cycle was not optimal, but I think it is because >> > > it >> > > overlapps with Christmas and New Year. >> > >> > Why was that suboptimal? We've been having that since all the 4.x.odd >> > releases >> >> I have the feeling that we are drifting more and more into February and to >> be honest I have never considered the betas/RCs around Christmas to be a >> good idea. It's bad for all those devs doing paid KDE development, it's bad >> for students (at least in Germany it overlapps with exam time, also in the >> US the term ends before Christmas). I will try to play with bugzilla to see >> whether there is a difference in number bugs reported in beta phase .odd vs >> .even. > So I did that - result is attached and it doesn't tell me anything except that > in the 4.10 cycle significantly less bugs have been created than in the other > cycles. > Have you taken into account that the CONFIRMED status changed to NEW, and should be added together?
> How is the data generated? It uses bugzilla Reports -> Tabular Reports > feature. Select "Status" in "Horizontal Axis" dropdown. Unselect everything in > the upper area (most important unselect everything in the status list), open > the "Search by Change History" area, select "[Bug creation]" in "where ANY of > the fields:" and enter the date of the beta 1 release in the from date field > and the final tagging date in the to date field. Then click generate report. > Do that for each of the release cycles. > > -- > Martin Gräßlin > _______________________________________________ > Kde-testing mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-testing > _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
