Hey, On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey, > > On Friday, April 26, 2013 23:28:34 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Of course, this being a proposal, its main purpose is to sollicit > > > feedback, > > > but I'd also move towards a solution, as far as this describes common > > > ground among all stakeholders. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > I'm all for it if modules want to do this, what we're going to need the > > list of exact modules that stop development of new features and make > sure > > all the parties that live under that module agree, i.e. kde-workspace has > > solid and powerdevil stuff in there. Have you talk to this guys and do > they > > agree to the "feature freeze"? > > The idea actually came up at a barbecue where Alex Fiestas (CC:'ed) was > present, and about to head off to Brno for the Solid sprint. > > One thing I checked with him afterwards is was about a possible rewrite of > parts of powerdevil, but I believe in the end the Solid team decided > against > the rewrite, so that is probably off the table. > > Another, possibly intrusive thing is the introduction of KPeople, a > framework > to "normalize" the concept of Contacts across the workspace. I don't know > enough to judge this, input here is welcome in how far this needs changes > all > over the workspace, or would need adjustments to the presented plan. Martin > (also CC:'ed), maybe you could weigh in here? > I'm not entirely sure what the context is here (the proposal you're talking about; it's cut off), but kpeople will affect mostly just applications/runtime things like kmail or korganizer. You could think of it as Nepomuk extension. Cheers -- Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
