On Sunday 22 December 2013 11:17:51 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Saturday 21 December 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > > 2013/12/21 Kevin Ottens <[email protected]>: > > > On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > >> Now, the hard part, how's versioning going to go now and in the future? > > >> I see you want to do a 5.0 of two frameworks and unstable of the > > >> others, > > >> so let's say 5.0.0 for karchive/threadweaver and 4.9.50 for the others. > > > > > > Let's keep it simple and make it 4.9.50 for all of them. We can't > > > exclude > > > that karchive or threadweaver won't see some changes between now and the > > > 5.0. > > > > Is that the right number to use? 4.9.50 is "less than" 4.12... > > Probably 4.95.0 ?
Good catch, makes more sense indeed. Cheers. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
