El Dimarts, 7 de gener de 2014, a les 09:40:39, David Faure va escriure: > On Sunday 05 January 2014 20:43:14 šumski wrote: > > On Sunday 05 of January 2014 12:40:05 David Faure wrote: > > ... > > > > > You can find it in kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-kf5-qt5, attached > > > here for convenience. > > > > Great, just a few questions ;-) > > 1) Is it expected that extra-cmake-modules and attica have the versioning > > scheme as other frameworks? i.e. are they considered as part of KF5 in > > future? > > Attica yes. > ECM no. > You're right, the ECM version number is probably wrong, since ECM internally > says version 0.0.9. > > The packaging scripts don't really support different version numbers for > different modules... well I reran them for ECM alone.
Shouldn't ecm be basically *not* be packaged with frameworks? I.e. do you plan to keep releasing ecm every time you release frameworks? I understood it was a separate project and thus the separate versioning. Cheers, Albert > > @PACKAGERS: extra-cmake-modules-0.0.9 is up, replacing the 4.95.0 version. > git-sha1 and sha256sum: > > 83dbc09088b53196993b13318e84459eeb26e8e4 > b8e0f0a9db14583aead8d60ff03ee2734a26a2f9881e69719efc81ec2e74da85 > sources/extra-cmake-modules-0.0.9.tar.xz > > > 2) Wrt. co-installability: atm KF5 cannot be installed side by kdelibs4 in > > same prefix due to file conflicts (e.g. kconfig_compiler, kmailservice, > > ktelnetservice, some DBus interface files) - is this also longer term > > plan, > > or it just hasn't yet been 100% tackled? > > I'll let Jonathan Riddell reply to that since he was spearheading the > effort. I don't mind renaming these binaries, if that helps (but after > TP1). _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
