On Wednesday 30 April 2014 07:50:02 Scott Kitterman wrote: > >The difference is that you will do proper testing with all the QA in > >place on > >each distros, we don't have such thing "upstream" beyond the tests. > > > >As for the mess, each distro picks their version as you said and you > >(as in > >distros) already do backports and cherry-pick patches, nothing new. > > A certain amount of it isn't new. What's new is upstream abandoning each > release as soon as it's out the door. We do not abandon the release because the release is master. What you call release will just be a technicality (putting things on a tarball), or at least that is the idea.
> We push all the maintenance updates too. After a certain point we are on > our own, but with KDE SC there has been a good level of support for from > upstream to get things in good shape. Now it's all going to be on us. Well, and in KDE SC it was mostly us (developers doing backports and fixes).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team