On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:01:47 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: > Il Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:18:01 -0700, Eric Hameleers ha scritto: > > No, of course not. I consider the git branch to be in eternal flux. The > > git HEAD may contain valuable usability patches but also other meh stuff > > Thanks to technical (CI, automated testing) and social (widespread code > review) measures, this assumption IMO does no longer hold true for the > vast majority of cases.
How does CI or automated testing prevent commits of marginal value in a stable branch (i.e. "meh stuff")? Scott K _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
