> On June 19, 2016, 10:07 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > pack_l10n.sh, line 27
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128223/diff/1/?file=469118#file469118line27>
> >
> >     This really looks like a very broad naming to be deleting, nowadays we 
> > don't have any matching, but i could easily see something like 
> > kcm_mimetimes.pot at some point.
> >     
> >     Maybe what we need to do is make scripty complain if he finds a 
> > *mimetype* file that it didn't generate?
> 
> Burkhard Lück wrote:
>     we should use a naming scheme indicating that a file is generated by 
> scripty see http://marc.info/?l=kde-i18n-doc&m=146640569414610&w=2

Agreed, do you want to wait until we agree on that?


- Albert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128223/#review96730
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 20, 2016, 6:21 p.m., Burkhard Lück wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128223/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2016, 6:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Release Team and Albert Astals Cid.
> 
> 
> Repository: release-tools
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   pack_l10n.sh 5afa5e8 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128223/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Burkhard Lück
> 
>

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Reply via email to