On 16 September 2016 11:55:50 BST, Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications
>release,
>> doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the
>> Applications release.
>> 
>> This causes issues - as we've received complaints about various
>> products (all being PIM products) missing versions on bugs.kde.org,
>> due to this mismatch. It's also confusing for users.
>> 
>> Can PIM please fall in line with the rest of Applications?
>
>This is common across lots of apps in Applications.  e.g. Umbrello is
>at 2.20.99 internally.  It's always been the case.
>
>Jonathan

This idea was discussed a year or two ago, and it was agreed then that 
applications would keep their own version numbering, if desired.

The KDE Applications version is simply a date indication. It's very useful, for 
developers who want it, to be able to have an individual application version 
which has a meaning in functional terms.

I strongly disagree with this proposal to change version numbers.

--
David Jarvie
KAlarm author, KDE developer
http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm

Reply via email to