El dijous, 16 de febrer de 2017, a les 12:53:04 CET, Daniel Vrátil va escriure: > On Monday, February 6, 2017 4:45:21 PM CET Daniel Vrátil wrote: > > On Monday, February 6, 2017 4:14:57 PM CET Heiko Becker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 02/06/17 16:00, Daniel Vrátil wrote: > > > >> LibKGAPI is currently a "library with an independent release schedule > > > >> (aka > > > >> extragear-libs). > > > > > > > > Yup, we are already extragear. > > > > > > > >> Just as reference, who are the current users? > > > > > > > > In PIM (and Applications) it's kdepim-runtime, blogilo and > > > > pim-storage- > > > > service-manager. > > > > > > > > > > > > Outside of KDE Applications it's kio-gdrive. > > > > > > any reason not to make it a framework? There are already users from > > > Applications and Extragear and it also has a 'KF5' prefix (like so many > > > other non frameworks, who IMHO shouldn't). > > > > It depends on KCalCore and KContacts which are not frameworks. Once those > > are moved to Frameworks, I will consider moving KGAPI too. > > > > Good point with the KF5 prefix, I will change it to "KPim", which we > > already did for KDAV library and eventually want to do for all our PIM > > libraries to solve the has-KF5-prefix-but-is-not-a-framework problem. > > This has now been implemented in master. It still provides KF5GAPI for > backwards compatibility (so that existing dependees don't break), but that > will eventually be removed in the future. > > Any more questions/objections, or can we proceed with the move?
Seems noone complained. I added it to the release modules.git https://cgit.kde.org/sysadmin/release-tools.git/commit/?id=477438a520fdfe4137794eefbe10cdf44e0aee43 Please proceed with the move in the virtual hierarchy. Cheers, Albert > > Cheers, > Dan > > > Dan > > > > > Regards, > > > Heiko
