On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:15 PM, ext [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14/08/2012 01:35, ext Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> On 14.8.2012 5.46, "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I can't see how this duplication of effort is helping us to reach >>> the Qt5 Beta milestone any quicker (actually quite the opposite >>> given how few people there seem to be involved with Qt5 packaging), >>> and we need to get to that milestone before anyone has time to >>> re-house or make radical changes to the CI infrastructure. >>> Therefore, we should either >>> >>> 1) Make both systems generate packages using exactly the same >>> scripts, configurations and environments (i.e., use copies of the >>> same VM's), or >>> >>> 2) Choose one set of packages, test only those, and shut down the >>> other system because nobody will be doing anything useful with its >>> output. >> >> My preference for #2 - unless we suddenly get a lot more resources to >> do the testing we would be better off with just one set. > > Ok, let's go for #2 right now, and focus on the packages being generated > from the Digia setup right now, until we have the Beta, and possibly the > final out. > > However, I still maintain that we _need_ to make this system use the > public CI system setup, and it's the only way we can get collaboration > on HW platform support. > > As we intend to distribute CI to multiple interested parties, we need to > do exactly the same for installer creation and packaging. > > But for now let's focus our resources on one set of results. +1. Lars _______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
