On Thursday, August 30, 2012 11:51:22 you wrote: > On 30.8.2012 14.44, "Stephen Kelly" <[email protected]> wrote: > >On Thursday, August 30, 2012 13:32:39 Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> On quinta-feira, 30 de agosto de 2012 13.29.03, Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> > So, how do we make sure this doesn't happen again? Does the packaging > >> > script attempt to run unit tests? Is that possible? > >> > >> The unit tests are run before the commit goes in. And that's why we've > >> > >>been > >> > >> testing. > > > >Yes. The unit tests are run *before* the installation step though. Never > >after. > > Unit tests are not run for installers, as they require developer build. > > As said before we have unit tests as well as automated release tests in > place for 4.8 releasing, but not 5.0 yet. That is why we need to do a lot > of manual testing. We will focus into putting this in place now also for > 5.0 so that before final we have good coverage in the automated testing.
Great thanks. The existing cmake unit tests (which do not require a developer build) also work with an installed Qt. However, there is a quiet check for a cmake installation. The cmake unit tests are only run if cmake is found in the PATH, so please ensure that when doing this work. > Manual testing will still be needed, but simple things are then caught by > the automation. Yes. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
