Em sex 21 fev 2014, às 23:45:32, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:30:18PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em sex 21 fev 2014, às 16:25:17, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu: > > > on top of that, your idea to automatically "force" the latest stable on > > > the "consumers" has a downside: it makes it actively hard to use the > > > "oldest version that works" approach (which is a quite reasonable one to > > > prevent accidentally requiring too new api). > > > > Stable contains "oldest version that works" by definition. > > uhm, no, it doesn't. it contains "the latest version we consider > stable (duh)". oldest is the opposite of latest.
Sorry, you're right. I didn't think it through because "oldest" doesn't make sense for tracking a repository. Updating implies you want something newer. If you want the oldest, don't update. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
