On Monday, February 24, 2014 19:26:29 Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > What is problematic is: > - reverse dependencies: we test qtdeclarative when changing qtbase and the > other way around.
I still think this should be removed. It made a lot of sense before the 5.0 release because the API in qtbase was changing so rapidly. That is not the case now. Unintended breaks are still caught by CI when qtdeclarative is built, albeit a bit later than when qtbase is built. This is the case for most repos downstream from qtbase. While it can be a good thing to prevent unintended breakage earlier, I don't think it's worth it and it should be removed. Use the hardware for something else instead. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
