On 23/05/14 15:25, "Sergio Ahumada" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 23.05.2014 14:22, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:57AM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote: >>> On Friday 23. May 2014 09.25.32 Turunen Tuukka wrote: >>>> On 23/05/14 10:40, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> >>>>wrote: >>>> We need to get this fix in anyway to the packages going towards our >>>> customers, so we might as well update all of the packages. >>> >>> I think I understand Thiago's hesitation and I'm also doubtful about >>>the real >>> impact of this. However if Digia is going to make packages available >>>to the >>> commercial customers anyway (due to Digia's priorities), I see little >>>harm in >>> updating the Qt project based packages. It sounds like a freebie to me >>>:) >>> >> then bite the bullet and call it 5.3.1. > >that's "a lot" of work (from the packaging perspective) And it is also not good idea from user¹s viewpoint as it causes quite some hassle in the messaging. Based on all the information I have so far Qt 5.3.0 seems to be a solid release and for other items than this Android item I think we can wait until the real Qt 5.3.1 is released in June. Let¹s decide this in the regular release team meeting on Monday. We¹ll prepare the packages. Either we then update only the commercial Android packages, or both open-source and commercial. Other than the Android packages do not need to be touched. Yours, Tuukka _______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
