That the failure to regulate might
constitute state action-as in failing to ban private segregation- was one of the
most hotly contested issues of the mid-sixties civil right litigation>THE Supreme
court ,if my memories of law school are reliable, always dodged the question. It
largely became moot as a result of the 1964 civil rights act. Marc Stern From: In a message dated 11/9/2004 5:00:06 PM Eastern Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems at least plausible that if you can make that work, you
can find state action in the failure of a local government agency to prevent
assaults on public sidewalks. After all, they are public property. Jim Henderson Senior Counsel ACLJ |
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.