Topside RLUIPA Briefs in Cutter v. Wilkinson

In No. 03-9877, Cutter v. Wilkinson (to be argued during the last two weeks in March), the Court will consider the constitutionality of section 3 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, which requires some accommodations for the religious exercise of persons in state-run institutions, including prisons. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that section 3 violates the Establishment Clause because RLUIPA grants accommodations only for the exercise of religion, and not for the exercise of other constitutional rights, and because it prefers religious to nonreligious prisoners. The Question Presented is limited to the Establishment Clause question. In its brief at the cert. stage, however, Ohio told the Court that it intends to urge at least two other, alternative grounds for affirmance: (i) that the Establishment Clause, in addition to imposing certain limits on all governments, also uniquely disables the federal government from dictating how the states should accommodate religion; and (ii) that Congress lacked the affirmative authority under the Spending and Commerce Clauses to enact RLUIPA.

Topside briefs were filed yesterday by:

Petitioners (persons incarcerated in the Ohio prison system);

The United States;

Senators Hatch and Kennedy (devoted to the questions of congressional authority) (Disclosure: I am counsel on the brief);

The States of New York and Washington;

The Coalition for the Free Exercise of Religion (a coalition of more than 50 religious, civil rights, and civil liberties groups);

The American Correctional Chaplains Association, former state corrections officials, state prisoners, and others;

Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the ACLU;

The Public Affairs of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America (a brief authored by Prof. Doug Laycock devoted to the alternative "federalism Establishment Clause" argument) [link not yet available]; and

The Rutherford Institute.

 

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to