Arthur V. Watkins, a Republican, was an honorable man.  Consequently, the censure of Joseph McCarthy was not done in error.  Had his information been "impeccable," he would not have been censured. 
 
The Party of Joseph McCarthy may, if it chooses, call the Democratic Party "the Democrat Party" in error.  It shows pique and little regard for history and fair discussion.  Arthur V. Watkins and others of honor will, in this author's view, remain a Republican.
 
It's not the "Republic Pary," either.
 
Smiling all the time,
 
Ed Darrell
Dallas, by way of Columbia Falls, Montana

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, Sandy, you got me.
 
His information, on the grand scale, was impeccable.  We were infiltrated, and the process was deliberate, targeted, and ongoing.  Whether he played lawyer's tricks with rosaries tucked into hankies, or Ross Perot tricks with empty boxes allegedly full of documents, the large truth is that he correctly called attention to a clear and present danger, one that was pooh-poohed by many for years after his exit from the stage, but which history has proved to have been real.
 
Jim  Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to