|
In a message dated 8/2/2005 1:42:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I'm looking but not seeing it. How nice of him to let me know he had responded to my article. This is the first time I ever knew there was a letter--should I care to make any rebuttal. And tell me, is it you or Professor Bradley or both of you who is so careless about accuracy that you have misspelled my name? Tsk, tsk. That is exactly what the Bible in the Schools curriculum has been taken to task for. Frances Paterson (please note one "T"--that is the Scottish rather than the English spelling). My misspelling.
It is a pdf file attached to the webpage.
Consult your webmaster or CIO or whatever on how to save or open such a
file hosted on the WWW (or just right mouse click on the image and select
save). If the letter is what it appears to be, it was written to the
publisher of your article. I guess he might have suggested that you two go
and bend a couple elbows at a local adult beverage establishment and talk about
this question, but his letter seems like a perfectly understandable "Letters to
the Editor" type response to what he appears to have considered a suspect
attack piece.
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
