|
In a message dated 8/20/2005 8:31:03 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And, in any case, it's a college level exam. There is no way this outline could be presented as evidence of what high school texts and curricula say. You seem to be suggesting that the level of biological sciences education
is more sophisticated and update in the high schools than in the colleges.
Perhaps. I don't know. I do know that evolutionary sources are quick
to dispel concerns that they still proceed on a recapitulationist model such as
suggested by Haeckel. But if that recapitulationism is rejected, why not
say something different than the discredited old saw. Otherwise it gets,
despite its decrepitude, an undeserved intellectual nod.
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
