CLS did not take a
position in the Wiccan case.
Greg Baylor
Gregory S. Baylor From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:59 AM To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject: Re: 4th Circuit rules (again) in favor of the Good News Club I ask the following question for edification -- How does
one square this decision with the 4th Cir's willingness to permit the Wiccan
woman to be excluded from delivering prayers at city council meetings? I'm
blanking on the name of the latter case, but it would seem that equality is at
issue in both cases, and the results would seem at first blush in conflict with
each other.
And what position did CLS take on the Wiccan case, if any?
Marci
Marci A. Hamilton
Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Yeshiva University
This is the case's second trip to the 4th Circuit, and once again the |
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.