Wouldn't such a policy be constitutionally valid under the ruling in Lehman
v. Shaker Heights, 418 U.S. 298 (1974) (holding that advertising space on
city buses is not a public forum, and upholding the city's rule forbidding
political advertising, while allowing commercial advertising, on the buses)?

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Corcos, Christine <
christine.cor...@law.lsu.edu> wrote:

> Fort Worth.  See here.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/17/us/17brfs-atheist.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
>
>  I think it may be a reaction to part of a campaign (linked to a similar
> campaign in Canada) that is continuing the "Good Without God" campaign that
> was launched last year.  See here.  http://atheistbus.ca/
>
> See the Atheist bus website here. http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/
>
> Christine Corcos
> Associate Professor of Law
> Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University
> Associate Professor, Women's and Gender Studies Program
> LSU A&M
> 324 Law Building
> 1 East Campus Drive
> Baton Rouge LA 70803
> tel: 225/578-8327
> fax: 225/578-3677
> home page: http://faculty.law.lsu.edu/ccorcos
> Feminist Law Professors (http://feministlawprofessors.com/)
> Law and Humanities Blog (http://lawlit.blogspot.com/)
> Law and Magic Blog  (http://lpcprof.typepad.com/law_and_magic_blog/)
> Media Law Blog (http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/)
> email: christine.cor...@law.lsu.edu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:35 PM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
>
>
> I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't recall all
> the details) reporting that a city prohibited all religious advertising on
> buses because people were annoyed with advertisements expressing a message
> by Atheists suggesting that there is no G-d. Wouldn't that regulation
> constitute unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under Rosenberger and
> Good News Club? I have serious problems with some of the Court's decisions
> that characterize discrimination against religious expressive activities as
> viewpoint discrimination. But if that's the rule, it would certainly seem to
> apply in this case as well.
>
> Alan Brownstein
> UC Davis School of Law
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe,
> unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>



-- 
Ira C. Lupu
F. Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law
George Washington University Law School
2000 H St., NW
Washington, DC 20052
(202)994-7053
My SSRN papers are here:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=181272#reg
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to