Thanks, Roger. I found it now. It included several provisions I did not have on my list, and did not include others that I did have; so it's very helpful, thanks.
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Roger Severino <rseveri...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I pasted the link from my phone so that may be the issue. When I go here > http://www.becketfund.org/blaineamendments/ I can access the links pasted > below (taken from the Becket Fund website). > > > Click on the links below to view each state’s Blaine Amendment and related > laws and decisions. Neither the state-specific pages, nor any other part of > this website, intends to or actually does provide legal advice. > Alabama <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/alabama/> > Kansas <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/kansas/> > North Dakota <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/north-dakota/> > Alaska <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/alaska/> > Kentucky <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/kentucky/> > Ohio <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/ohio/> > Arizona <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/arizona/> > Massachusetts <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/massachusetts/> > Oklahoma <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/oklahoma/> > California <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/california/> > Michigan <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/michigan/> > Oregon <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/oregon/> > Colorado <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/colorado/> > Minnesota <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/minnesota/> > Pennsylvania <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/pennsylvania/> > Delaware <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/delaware/> > Mississippi <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/mississippi/> > South Carolina <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/south-carolina/> > District of Columbia > <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/district-of-columbia/> > Missouri <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/missouri/> > South Dakota <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/south-dakota/> > Georgia <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/georgia/> > Montana <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/montana/> > Texas <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/texas/> > Hawaii <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/hawaii/> > Nebraska <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/nebraska/> > Utah <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/utah/> > Idaho <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/idaho/> > Nevada <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/nevada/> > Virginia <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/virginia/> > Illinois <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/illinois/> > New Hampshire <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/new-hampshire/> > Washington <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/washington/> > Indiana <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/indiana/> > New Mexico <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/new-mexico/> > Wisconsin <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/wisconsin/> > Iowa <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/iowa/> > New York <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/new-york/> > Wyoming <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/wyoming/> > Kansas <http://www.becketfund.org/blaine_posts/kansas/> > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu < > religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu> on behalf of Marty Lederman < > lederman.ma...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, April 30, 2016 4:27 PM > > *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > *Subject:* Re: State law question raised by Trinity Lutheran Church > > Unless I'm missing something, that page doesn't even have cites or links > to the provisions analogous to the Blaine amendment (dealing with schools), > let alone to the provisions akin to those at issue in Missouri, > which--unlike the Blaine Amendment--expressly prohibit funding of churches > and religious institutions. > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Roger Severino <rseveri...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Try this link. http://www.becketfund.org/blaineamendments/#states >> >> >> >> On Apr 30, 2016, at 09:07, Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c) <hd...@virginia.edu> >> wrote: >> >> I think there's a compilation on the Becket Fund website. There are a lot >> more little Blaine Amendments than your list, but they are not all the >> same, and maybe a lot of them don't meet your criterion of absoluteness. >> >> Douglas Laycock >> Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law >> University of Virginia >> 580 Massie Road >> Charlottesville, VA 22903 >> 434-243-8546 >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [ >> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] on behalf of Caroline Abbott [ >> czhabb...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Saturday, April 30, 2016 8:52 AM >> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics >> *Subject:* Re: State law question raised by Trinity Lutheran Church >> >> Oklahoma State Constitution, Article II Section 5. >> On Apr 30, 2016 7:32 AM, "Marty Lederman" <lederman.ma...@gmail.com >> <http://redir.aspx?REF=7TY-AGLRbzDPV58nOsn1kwvE2WJ5_063IHkiY83Wl0nLybMo-HDTCAFtYWlsdG86bGVkZXJtYW4ubWFydHlAZ21haWwuY29t>> >> wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know of a good, authoritative source for a listing of all >>> states that have a constitutional provision (or a statute) like those in >>> Missouri that categorically forbid the payment of public funds, or >>> appropriations, to churches, as such, to "religious institutions," or >>> something similar? >>> >>> I believe there are or were such provisions in AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, GA, >>> ID, IL, IN, MO, OR, and WA. Am I missing any? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu >>> <http://redir.aspx?REF=pO6Dl9CZqXtbyEihPHusThchnyPf48DR3awBedd5lMTLybMo-HDTCAFtYWlsdG86UmVsaWdpb25sYXdAbGlzdHMudWNsYS5lZHU.> >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see >>> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw >>> <http://redir.aspx?REF=k6xCkQ3j0vn4owYrzRPmbuKp9DvNu_ca3_hU2n29EA3LybMo-HDTCAFodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMudWNsYS5lZHUvY2dpLWJpbi9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JlbGlnaW9ubGF3> >>> >>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as >>> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are >>> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or >>> wrongly) forward the messages to others. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see >> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw >> >> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as >> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are >> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or >> wrongly) forward the messages to others. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see >> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw >> >> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as >> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are >> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or >> wrongly) forward the messages to others. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
