Tough call, both are terrific choices considering the correct split - the micor uses no computerized anything, just plain old hardware. If you can obtain manuals for both you will have to toss a coin, I would take them both as many parts are interchangeable between them.
Ted Maczulat wrote: > > We are upgrading a repeater site and have a choice of using Micor or MSR2000 > equipment. > The MSR is newer but that does not necessarily mean better. > > Both are factory built VHF repeaters with factory built UHF basestations as > link radios. > Both are in pristine condition, and in the correct bandsplit with original > PL boards for use in the ham bands. > We will be using an RLC4 controller to replace the stock controller boards. > > The site could be considered a high RF environment with many other service > on the mountain top. > > My question to the group is which would be better to use. > > I would be interested to hear opinions one way or the other. > > Thank You > Ted, VE7TFM > Technical Director > Arrowsmith Amateur Radio Club > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- 73...Clark Beckman N8PZD Pursuant to U.S. Code, title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, �227, "Any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee of $500.00 U.S.". E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
