Wrong.
The Mastr Pro came out several years BEFORE the Micor.

"ac0y5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SNIP
> The MASTR PRO must have been copied from the Micor also, because it 
> to is modular. A receiver module , a Exciter/ PA module, and a power 
> supply. All modules are solid components. It is more than SOME Micor 
> repeaters that I've seen.  I think the Progress Line was some what 
> modular, and so was some of the pre Micor Motorola's (trying to use 
> some Very rusty brain cells).
> 73
> AC0Y
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Paul Finch" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I look at it this way, they used the Micor to decide how not to 
> build the
> > kind of transmitter Motorola did, the Micor is one of the most over
> > engineered radios ever.  They over-engineered it so they 
> (Motorola) could
> > use it in everything from mobiles to paging transmitters and 
> paging link
> > receivers.  I am not saying it's a bad radio, just has way to many 
> things in
> > it that can go wrong.  One example, switching the ground to turn 
> the High
> > Band Micor transmitter on, WHY!?  If I remember correctly they did 
> not do
> > that in the UHF version, again WHY!?
> > 
> By the way, If you switch A- to ground to key the exciter, why does 
> taking the A- to the PA to ground take it off the air (output goes 
> to zero)? (in a MSR2000. Some say that it is a cheep Micor)
> 
> > I worked on a lot of Micors and GE's back when they first came 
> out, I can't
> > see a lot of similarity between the two.  If the engineers copied 
> anything I
> > can't see it much!
> > 
> > Buying a competitors radio is a common practice, Quintron/Glenayre 
> bought
> > Motorola's radios and vise-versa, happens in every industry, not 
> just with
> > radios.
> > 
> > When you get into someone coping a design the RCA people copied 
> the GE
> > Master II and had to pay big bucks when GE took them to court, RCA 
> was
> > pretty much out of business after that.
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Custer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 9:29 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] GE Stuff.....
> > 
> > 
> > In the context of the difference between the Mastr II and Mastr 
> Exec........
> > 
> > Virden Clark Beckman wrote:
> > 
> > > The executive line does not have the dual squelch stuff that was 
> the big
> > thing in 72 when that idea debuted...
> > >
> > 
> > You mean when the GE engineers dissected the Micor to help build 
> the
> > Mastr II?
> > 
> > Motorola debuted the dual squelch in the late 60's.....
> > 
> > BTW:  No one needs to flame me on the first comment.  I have 
> recently
> > been introduced to two top engineers that worked for GE's Two-Way 
> radio
> > division when the Mastr II was developed.  Both fully admitted 
> that the
> > Micor was used to help design the Mastr II.  If you doubt this, I'm
> > sorry, but all you need to do is look at the facts:
> > 
> > 5 LARGE  Helical resonators.
> > 11 Meg I-F
> > Dual Squelch
> > Elementized Channel Oscillators
> > Power sensing RF protection
> > Numerous other things mechanical, electrical, and physical, but 
> it's too
> > early to remember them all....
> > 
> > 
> > Kevin Custer
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
> 






 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to