... finally ... 

  Neil 


Paul Finch wrote:
> 
> Neil,
> 
> You have to realize, once you got one of the expensive burnishing 
> tools it meant you were accepted as a Tech! 
> 
> Paul
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:09 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Re: [[Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Stuff.....]]
> 
>   Must be a later model ...
> 
>   Neil
> 
> Paul Finch wrote:
> >
> > Huh, my burnishing tool is from the 70's!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:10 PM
> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Re: [[Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Stuff.....]]
> >
> >   I had two problems with the base & repeater station Mastr Pro power
> >  supplies:  ( EP38 Series )
> >
> >     1) the electrolytic capacitors which had to be replaced every 20
> >        years or so.
> >
> >     2) the cooling fan motor - which needed to be lubricated from
> >        time to time.
> >
> >   Didn't hurt to burnish the relay contacts from time to time too.
> >
> >   I still have the burnishing tool from the sixties.
> >
> >   As many of you personally know, there are two variations of the UHF
> >  Mastr Pro transmitters:
> >
> >   The early version has a 7377 (tube) tripler/driver stage.  Tuning
> >  was a severe pain as some will remember.
> >   Model numbers included: ET-59B and ET-60B
> >
> >   The late version has the Varactor Diode tripler stage.  Tuning was
> >  quite simple in comparison.
> >   Model numbers included: ET-59C, D and F; and ET-60C, D
> >
> >   You might note, John Mackey. KS0F, has written an excellent paper
> >  on the proper care of the UHF Mastr Pro Transmitter.
> >
> >   My first repeater was a GE (early) Progress Line - the series that
> >  used the 2C39 as a driver and another as the final.  The repeater
> >  came in various output power ratings.  20 watts for the lower power
> >  to 60 or 90 watts for the higher power units.
> >
> >   Another repeater used the Motorola T44A6, T44A6A and T44AAV receiver
> >  and transmitter strips.  (Yes Mike, I have the manuals for those
> >  radios of yours here.)
> >
> >   Neil McKie
> >
> > Paul Finch wrote:
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > Your correct, the Master Pro was a very good radio, in the shop that
> > > I worked at we did the service for a freight delivery fleet of over
> > > 200 Master Pro's.  The only part that I did not like was in the UHF
> > > transmitter where it had a varactor diode tripler.  It could and from
> > > time to time did cause serious harmonics and or transmit noise.  GE
> > > fixed that problem with the Master II.  The only other problem I know
> > > of was with the mobile power supply, the rectifier diodes were poor
> > > quality and they would go bad, we got to where we would just replace
> > > all of the high voltage diodes with M-2.5 Mallory replacements.
> > >
> > > My second repeater was a UHF Master Pro, I removed the 12 volt mobile
> > > power supply and installed a 110 volt Motorola Compa Station supply
> > > (with a few modifications).  I built a 10 and 12 volt regulated power
> > > supply and used the repeater controller I had built for my first
> > > repeater.  By the way, my first repeater was built out of a T-44 with
> > > a AC power supply.  The GE Master Pro repeater worked for years.  Sort
> > > of takes you back don't it!
> > >
> > > Also, your very correct about the GE TPL radios, they stunk!
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: JOHN MACKEY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:20 AM
> > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Re: [[Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Stuff.....]]
> > >
> > > The Mastr Pro was a excellent radio, & still it's spec's are very good
> > even
> > > by
> > > today's standard.  I still have SEVERAL of the late model Mastr Pro's in
> > > service as repeaters on 6 meters, 2 meters, and 440 MHz in Oregon &
> > > Washington.  Their receivers hold up in the most harsh environments.  I
> > have
> > > no immediate plans of retiring my Mastr Pro repeaters.
> > >
> > > (Of course, the Micor is no slouch either - I have those on as repeaters
> > in
> > > Iowa)
> > >
> > > Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > SNIP
> > > >  the Mastr Pro showed the county shop guys all was not lost.
> > > >  I know, I was impressed.
> > > SNIP
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to