Oops so much for proof reading 220 it is -----Original Message----- From: Corey Dean N3FE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:41 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Re: [[Repeater-Builder] Hi / I am new]]
Linking on 2 meters? Maybe on 220.... Corey N3FE > There is always the split site solution for 6M repeaters, where your > transmitter and receiver reside in two separate locations linked by a 2M > or 70cm freq. > Its always a possibility but getting two sites of equal coverage can be > a bit time consuming but for 6M it would be my first choice > > -----Original Message----- > From: JOHN MACKEY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:20 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Re: [[Repeater-Builder] Hi / I am new]] > > > putting a 6 meter repeater on the air is going to be a lot more trouble > compared to 2 meters or UHF. > > I've been a ham 20 years and have put several repeaters on the air for 6 > meters thru 440 MHz. > > "John Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
