You may find this link helpful when looking at the matching harness for 
these dipoles:  http://www.w4dex.com/ant.htm

It's appeared here before but will be helpful to see it again.

73,
Tony W4ZT

At 01:52 AM 4/18/2004, you wrote:

>--- Chuck Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just curious... how did you determine that each
> > element was 50 ohms?
> >
> > I was always of the understanding that the Decibel
> > design, each element was
> > 100 ohms. Also, that the later versions of Decibel
> > arrays used 50 ohm and 35
> > ohm cable, no 75 ohm stuff.
> >
> > Chuck
> > WB2EDV
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Al Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 6:20 PM
> > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Decibel repeater
> > antenna question......
> >
> >
> > >     I've worked on a great many of these types of
> > antenna arrays in the
> > last
> > > 35+ years and every one had an impedance of 50
> > ohms at the individual
> > > element. An odd multiple of a 1/4 wavelength of 75
> > ohm coax takes it to
> > 100
> > > ohms. When stacking elements two 100 ohm loads in
> > parallel are 50. Then do
> > > it again for four bays, again for eight, etc.
> > >
> > >     In free space their impedance would be higher,
> > but they are designed
> > to
> > > work only a few inched from a mast pipe and
> > normally the elements are
> > fairly
> > > fat in terms of diameter to length ratio  Hence
> > the nominal 50 ohm
> > > impedance.
> > >
> > >     Another scheme was to use two bays, make the
> > feed line from each bay a
> > > piece of 50 ohm cable, the length being
> > unimportant other than being
> > equal,
> > > and tying them together for 25 ohms. Then a
> > special 35 ohm 1/4 wave piece
> > of
> > > line brought it back to 50 ohms.  Two pieces of 75
> > ohm cable in parallel
> > > would do the same transformation but can be messy
> > to fabricate.
> > >
> > > YMMV, though,
> > >
> > > 73, Al K9SI
> > >
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > > Judging from the cable and the lengths listed,
> > each
> > > dipole must present a 100 ohm impedence, not 50,
> > > assuming the data is correct.
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>IF the lengths and types of coax are correctly
>represented by the web article (and I don't know that
>for a fact) THEN the impedence would work out to 100
>ohms per bay. 50 ohm impedence per bay does not work
>out correctly, given the info from the web site.
>
>http://www.kc5dgc.net/db224.htm
>
>Taking their measurements, all coax sections are "Q"
>sections, or impedence transformers. A 75 ohm Q
>section will transform 50 to 100 ohs OR 100 to 50
>ohms. A 35 ohm q section will transform 50 ohms to 25
>ohms OR 25 ohm to 50 ohms.
>
>Now, you can start from either end if you know the
>impedence. Since we know this antenna is 50 ohms at
>the feed point, and from there it goes through a 35
>ohm Q section, the impedence at the first tee would be
>25 ohms. Since 2 cables are in parallel at this tee,
>each cable (at that point) must represent 50 ohms (2
>50 ohm resistors paralleled give 25 ohms). Now you can
>take either leg at this point, since the top pair and
>the bottom pair are identical. Going through the 35
>ohm Q section transforms our 50 ohms to 25 ohms. This
>would be at the upper or lower tee. At this tee, to
>have 25 ohms, we must have a pair of 50 ohm impedences
>meeting at the tee. Now we go through a 75 ohm Q
>section, which raises the impedence to 100 ohms, which
>should be the impedence of each dipole, if we want the
>thing to match.
>
>Going backwards, start at the dipole and assume 100
>ohms. The 75 ohm Q section changes this to 50 ohms.
>Two 50 ohms in parallel is 25 ohms (at the top or
>bottom tee). The 35 ohm Q section changes this to 50
>ohms, again in parallel with the bottom 2 bays which
>would also be 50 ohms, which gives 25 ohms. The final
>35 ohm Q section transforms the 25 ohms to 50 ohms, to
>feed our coax of any length.
>
>Now, if we assume each dipole is 50 ohms, here's what
>happens. The first 75 ohm Q section will increase the
>impedence to 100 ohms. 2 100 ohms in parallel will
>give 50 ohms. The 35 ohm Q section will transform that
>to 25 ohms. Now we have two 25 ohms in parallel,
>giving us 12.5 ohms going into the last Q section. By
>using Q section calculations, this 35 ohm section
>would transform the impedence to 100 ohms, or a 2 to 1
>match for our 50 ohm coaxial line. Although 2 to 1
>will work, it's generally not acceptable for repeater
>use, where we like to see 1.2 to one or so, with 1.5
>being an outside margin.
>
>IF all the Q sections (except the first) were 75 ohm
>cable, then you would have 50 ohms at each dipole.
>This  is the usual way of phasing 4 50 ohm antennas,
>but these antennas must present a different impedence
>for them to do what they do.
>
>Joe
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25�
>http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to