Steve Rodgers wrote:
>
> What is considered a high performance number for CTCSS/PL ackquisition time?
> According to what I see posted on the web (which may or may not be real) The
> Comspec TS-32 is 250msec, and the TS-64 is 150msec. The actual decode time
> should get worse as you go lower in frequency, so what would you think are
> high performance numbers for at say, 67 hz?
>
>
> Steve
> WA6ZFT
Those numbers are pretty normal, and the frequency of the tone normally
has no noticable effect on decode time, with modern decoders. I haven't
seen a variation in decode time related to freq decoded since the days
of the big old copper motorola reeds. Even then it was usually more a
problem with bad reeds or noise in the transmitter or receiver signal.
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
