Yes, I too have replaced one RC100 with a RC210. Nope, not what I wanted to hear, however I know that in the future when I get some bucks...it will be replaced :-( Thanks, Robert
--- In [email protected], Kevin Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chuck Kelsey wrote: > > >Several years back, I got involved with a couple of repeaters using the MCC > >controllers. They just did strange, unexplainable things. The owners of the > >repeaters eventually grew tired of the problems and replaced the controllers > >with either S-Com or Link controllers. These repeaters now run with no > >controller issues and have done so for a long time. > > > >Not necessarily the "fix" you wanted to hear, but it solved the problems. > > > > I have to agree with the findings that Chuck has mentioned. At one time > I owned about a dozen MCC controllers, mostly the RC-100 due to cost. > After these controllers got some age on them, they started becoming > spooky, and the factory was of no real help. I still have a few that > work perfectly, but the most of them have been replaced with other > simple controllers like the NHRC-4. I simply got tired of having the > controllers do things on their own. For the reasons mentioned, I no > longer recommend these controllers as the NHRC platform is much more stable. > > Kevin Custer Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
