As long as the ten-meter remote transmitter was operating in the repeater subband, you'd be working through the 440 repeater and within the privileges of your license. The fellow who owns and operates the system would be responsible for his emissions on all bands. That doesn't mean you could use ill content and get away with it though.
73, Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:25 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] another tech type of question > > With the voip/echolink/irlp systems on the net these > days that cover all sorts of bands who would be held > responsible for transmitting on say a 10 meters node > attached to a 440 repeater through one of these types > of services? > > To be more clear, say I connect to someones 440 > repeater on echolink that also has a 10 meter remote > running simulcast and I had no knowledge the 10 meter > remote was in operation. Would I be held responsible > for transmitting out of my class of license or would > the control operator be held responsible? > > On many ocasions I have used such listed services and > found myself in a qso with someone that tells me I'm > on a band I'm not licensed to operate. > > Any input is welcome. > > Regards, Barry > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
