I had a QSO with a ham who went to this 802.11 and dropped his DSL or dial 
up, he had mentioned something about gain increase with a beam antenna just 
to get in ..  weather the company for that area selling the access had set 
this up I have no clue.

I think the FCC  has other Big Fish to fry like Nextel vs. BAS rebanding , 
and a few other Big Name Businesses who have bigger wallets, and K1MAN and 
other things we all know  !

Mark Holman  AB8RU
Happy Holidays
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wade Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: 4-wire E&M + VoIP (was: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Remote 
Receiver


>
>     Not that I am sticking up for rule breakers or anything, but I doubt
> the FCC has the manpower to go after 802.11 offenders.  It's basically 
> like
> with CB anymore.  If you are not causing major problems for a lot of 
> folks,
> they arent going to look your way.
>
>     That being said, I believe in careful compliance to the rules.  The
> Part 15 rules are not as straight forward as a maximum ERP.  They allow 1
> watt with a 6dBi gain antenna and they require a reduction in power, a dB 
> of
> power for a dB of antenna gain, for omni antennas that have more than 6dBi
> of gain.  For directional antennas running point to point, they require a
> reduction of 1dB in power for every 3 dBi of antenna gain over the allowed
> 6dBi.  This becomes a little confusing but it means that when you account
> for cable losses, most point to point setups running a 1/2 wat or 1 watt 
> amp
> with the grid-dish type antennas and yagis, are in the clear.
>
> Wade - KR7K
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Perryman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:59 PM
> Subject: RE: 4-wire E&M + VoIP (was: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Remote
> Receiver
>
>
>>
>> I realize this is a "rules thing"...  pardon my momentary digression....
>>
>> Please keep in mind that the power limitation for those part 15 devices 
>> is
>> ERP...  not TPO.  Lots of folks with high gain antennas and amplifiers on
>> their houses are in violation...  hope they don't get caught.
>> Seems the Commission has been on an enforcement (revenue) binge lately..
> no
>> slack given.
>>
>>  73's
>> Mike Perryman
>> www.k5jmp.us
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bob Dengler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 4:51 PM
>> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: 4-wire E&M + VoIP (was: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Remote
>> Receiver
>>
>>
>>
>> At 12/8/2004 12:40 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> >Steve Rodgers wrote:
>> >
>> > >Nate,
>> > >
>> > >Why not use a full duplex RF link to your data center?  That way you
>> could
>> > >have "dumb" hardware at the site, and all your smarts at the data
>> > center. You
>> > >could also avoid paying for a DSL connection at the site as well.
>> > >
>> > >Steve
>> > >WA6ZFT
>> > >
>> > >
>> >Ah, a number of reasons.
>> >
>> >Commercial sites you pay by the antenna, but there's more often than not
>> >at least one TCP/IP pipe that someone already pays for at most
>> >commercial sites now that an appropriate deal can be made to ride along
>> >on, and some really fat shared pipes available at some.
>> >
>> >Simplicity - maintaining a cheap IAXy device (throw it away if it
>> >breaks) is better than messing with multiple link radios, feedlines,
>> >antennas, etc.  Put the redundancy in the data network instead.
>> >
>> >Why?  If you put your own IP pipes in, you can do other things with
>> >them... it's more "universally useful" than a dedicated link radio to do
>> >other "stuff" with at the sites... remote monitoring, reprogramming, run
>> >club servers, remote power switching, etc etc etc... and
>> >what-have-you... lots of uses only limited by imagination -- a dedicated
>> >link radio is a one-hit wonder.
>>
>> ...and if internet isn't available at the site, how about using 802.11b 
>> or
>> a to bring it in?  I've yet with play with that stuff, but it sounds to 
>> me
>> like a pair of gain antennas at each end could get you a couple of miles
> to
>> where you would have wired internet access.  Anyone try this?
>>
>> Bob NO6B
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to