Since the system is not a coordinated repeater, it has nothing to do with the coordination coucil. At least one OO did speak with the licensee. There were several discussion about this within the OO ranks.
------ Original Message ------ Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:02:45 PM CST From: "Mark Holman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem frompager transmitters > > Something like that should be passed along to the Repeater Council or the > Official Observer to see if they can talk to this individual. unless he > wants to be famous in the ARRL web site with a letter from the FCC or > something. > > I can't offer any other solution. > > Mark Holman AB8RU > *** IT Student ***** > Happy Holidays > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:58 PM > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem > frompager transmitters > > > > > > It sure is - a mess, that is. Repeated offers to the guy to offer help > > with > > a Service Monitor, etc. have gone rejected. He's using a ham dual-bander > > mobile radio at a high-level site, and some of the garbage noise has > > caused > > one of the main local 2-Meter Portland Repeaters to kerchunk continually > > whenever the IRLP or Echolink (or whatever it's called) "system" keys up. > > It's also tied up one of the main local 2-Meter simplex channels that was > > normally designated for many years as a "Remote Base to Remote Base" > > channel. > > > > What some people won't do just to be a "Repeater Owner"..... > > > > LJ > > > > > > > > Original Message: > > ----------------- > > From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:12:06 -0600 > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem > > frompager transmitters > > > > > > > > Sounds like a similar problem here in Portland, Oregon. > > > > We have a guy running an IRLP node here on what is commonly thought of as > > 2 > > meter simplex frequencies. The station is on a broadcast tower with high > > elevation running about 375 watts ERP!!! Mobiles 100 miles away can > > clearly > > hear the IRLP node!! The IRLP node is made from amateur grade RF > > equipement & > > has had SEVERAL problems with causing interference with the inputs of > > other > > repeaters in the area. Attempting to talk to the owner & suggesting he > > put > > sharp cavity filters on the transmitter resulted in his reply of "then I > > wouldn't be able to be frequency agile". > > > > Meanwhile, his deviation has been measured at +/- 9 KHz, and he argues > > that > > there is nothing wrong because a telecom service agency measured & set his > > deviation. > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:23:57 AM CST > > From: "Jim B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem > > from > > pager transmitters > > > >> > >> Except that the vast majority of VHF transmitters/networks weren't > >> really capable of multi-freq on the fly as you describe. At least around > >> here, anyway, they were virtually all Micor PURC stations. > >> And most sites would not have allowed the transmitters to remain without > >> cavites anyway. > >> -- > >> Jim Barbour > >> WD8CHL > >> > >> > >> Joe wrote: > >> > >> > You will find less and less narrow band cavities on paging transmitters > >> > lately. As the paging industry slowly goes into their death spiral of > >> > loosing customers, they no longer need 2, 4 or more transmitters at > > each > >> > site to deal with the capacity of pagers out there. What some > > companies > >> > are doing is leaving one transmitter at the site and doing > >> > multi-frequencies out of a single transmitter (This is assuming they > > were > > > >> > all on the same band, 900Mhz for example.) When they multi-frequency a > >> > transmitter they need to remove any narrow band filters off the > > transmitter > >> > output. This may explain why some ham repeater sites that were quiet > > now > > > >> > have noise problems. The irony of it is that you see paging > > transmitters > > > >> > leaving a site and think that the noise floor is going to go down, only > > to > > > >> > find that the nose increases tenfold. > >> > > >> > 73, Joe, K1ike > >> > > >> > At 09:53 AM 12/21/2004, you wrote: > >> > > >> >>All paging transmitters involved should have narrow bandpass cavities > >> >>and circulators on their outputs. That's usually considered a must at > >> >>any site. If the paging company isn't willing to spend the money for > >> >>that, then they aren't to serious about staying in business. > >> >>The good news is that VHF common carrier paging is slowly going away, > >> >>and the remaining frequencies will likely be dropped and released back > >> >>into the general pool in a few years, or less. > >> >>There is virtually no VHF paging here in NE Ohio anymore. > >> >>-- > >> >>Jim Barbour > >> >>WD8CHL > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > > http://mail2web.com/ . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
