Yup, I do agree.
Neil
JOHN MACKEY wrote:
>
> Anyone who has worked for the government will easily understand
> this situation. Often times it is FAR easier & quicker to get
> approval for costs of repairing equipment already owned/existing
> when compared to the efforts it takes to get approval & secure
> funding for purchasing something new. (The fact that buying new
> may be cheaper or better makes little difference)
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:20:33 PM CST
> From: Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SNIP
> > Quietly I snickered when I found out what they wanted. They really
> > wanted their end of the system completely overhauled and placed back
> > in service. No matter of suggestion that they could get something
> > one tenth in weight / ten times the reliability brand new.
> >
> > In the end, I had completely retubed the system, a B94AAB base
> > station, and finally gave up at about 225 watts output.
> SNIP
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
