But now you're comparing apples to oranges.

He was originally talking about having the repeater in a comm van.  Comm vans
(& trailers) are intended to be mobile and placed either AT or very NEAR the
problem area.  You are talking about putting a relay at or near the problem
area & having the comm CENTER (not the comm van) back at the long established
headquarters location.

------ Original Message ------
Received: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:36:24 AM CST
From: "Mike Perryman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Mobile Repeaters?

> 
> Exactly the case when the nut flew a plane into the Pentagon.  The Incident
> Command Center was at the salvation Army Headquarters a number of miles
> away...  right next door to a fire station on VHF high-split.  It desensed
> the 2m receiver there. I would guess because of the low signal strength
from
> the use of handheld radios at the impact site.  Comms were virtually
> impossible.  Until we put a portable commo trailer (now in my back yard,
> donated by AK1E) in the parking lot of the Pentagon with a 110 watts out to
> the antenna.  Then the handheld radios could be reduced to a couple hundred
> mils...  which also greatly extended battery life. And the repeater had
> enough "juice" to punch through the adjacent fire station without causing
IX
> problems.  We also had the Incident Command reduce his output to eliminate
> IX to the fire station.  Things went from no-comm to near ideal!!
> 
> Not really sure why Incident Command was located remotely...  most likely
> politics. Haney showed up the next day for pictures and the PR
> opportunity... along with the SEC.
> 
> But there are sometimes good (necessary?) reasons to employ a portable
> repeater...
> 
>  73
> Mike Perryman
> www.k5jmp.us
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 6:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mobile Repeaters?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- JOHN MACKEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That seems like a ridiculous idea to put a repeater
> > in the comm van.
> 
> Not really.  The incident command function may not be
> done from the comm van.  The comm van may have simplex
> coverage to the units, but the incident commander may
> be in a bad Rf location.  The repeater, if used
> properly, can be an asset to that person.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to