Well Joe M, lets see here....
The originator of the coordination topic already asked
everyone concerned about the "coordination issue" to
take it to a private forum or email list and not to
burden the rest of the repeater builders with a local
matter. Did anyone read it and follow Matthew's
request...You apparently didn't.
I think not....<SPAM> bs to follow the list server...
As for type acceptance, who cares...This forum isn't
the place for people to interpret fcc crap, take it
offline to an ffc forum.
The forum "I think" was intended to support folks to
build repeaters & not interpret rules & regulations of
the FCC.
If everyone were to interpret the FCC rules we would
have more opinions than @ssholes giving advice.
If anyone building a repeater has concerns with any
equiptment they plan to use as a repeater this really
falls on them to validate said equipment with the FCC
as they are the actual responsible party to the FCC.
The arm chair legal folks need to park their advice
for what it's worth...NOTHING.
My 4 cents worth...
--- mch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, as it HELPS to know if the repeater you are
> planning to put on the
> air is technically sound to put on the air, I don't
> know what would be
> on topic. Are we to be limited to talking about how
> to build HAM
> repeaters only? (which don't need TA)
>
> That said, who are you to decide what is off topic.
> Not every topic can
> be of interest to everyone. If that were the case,
> nobody would be able
> to discuss anything. Now if Kevin were to make such
> a post restricting
> list use, that would be different, but I don't see
> you signing your post
> as a moderator (or signing it as ANYTHING, for that
> matter).
>
> I would hope Kevin would let the discussion
> continue, as it is of VITAL
> importance to anyone putting a non-ham repeater on
> the air.
>
> Personally, if a topic is not of interest to me, I
> use the delete button
> rather than gripe about it - especially on the list.
> If you don't want
> to see an entire thread, add it to your email
> client's auto-delete using
> the subject as the filter. *Poof*! It's gone!
>
> Joe M.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > How about everyone concerned about "Type"
> acceptance
> > and part 9x rules take this topic offline in
> private
> > email whith those who get a Sh!#.
> >
> > This is a repeater builder forum "NOT FCC" land!
> >
> > Same thing goes for Coordination crap, take it
> > offline!
> >
> > Everyone has an opinion about coordinators, who
> > cares...
> >
> > This has nothing to do with Repeater-Builders.
> >
> > --- Kevin King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please provide the name of the FCC engineer that
> > > told you this. And provide
> > > the document number they referenced.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
