Hi Neil and all

Thanks for all of your input and suggestions.  I guess I'll go with 
RG-214/U simply for the storage factor and rolling/unrolling I can 
see happening during drills and (hopefully not), an 
actual "event"...superflex, I'm afraid, might get crushed or "bent 
out of shape".  

I like the idea that was presented about the camper 
flagpole "mast".  We have a camping center a few miles from here so 
I'll be making a call to see if they have them available.  As far as 
an antenna is concerned, I'll prolly start out with the comtelco I 
currently have and run some real life tests...its small, light, and 
a mast made out of almost anything should support it.

Russ, you mentioned a solar panel you put on the hood of your suv.  
May I ask the specs on what you use?  The setup I am going to be 
using is:  XMTR- 40 Watt maxtrac turned down to about 15-20 watts 
(with a 12V fan) into the duplexer (which is by the way, an old 
motorola TFE6080 "diplexer"), RCVR- 25 watt maxtrac, controller- 
mother "M" R.I.C.K..  I haven't checked the amperage that the setup 
uses...I'll have to get my hands on a meter...mine is blown up:-(  
For AC use and while assembling the unit, I have a maxon 12 amp 
supply that seems to do fine.

Before someone says something about the maxtrac transmitter 
compliance, I know, I know...its 5ppm, but hey, this is for 
emergency use.


Thanks again
Bob, GMRS WPVV845, Amateur KG4WAD, LMRS WPXC892


--- In [email protected], Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> 
>   If it comes to a question here, I use either the silver plated 
>  RG-223 or RG-214 ... better still is Andrew Heliax.  
> 
>   Hello Will, 
> 
>   Neil - WA6KLA 
> 
> motarolla_doctor wrote:
> > 
> > > RG-8X was developed with a larger center conductor and
> > > the dilectric was made out of a material to allow the
> > > larger conductor while keeping the outer size about
> > > the same as rg-59.
> > 
> > I mite add some to this: The RG8X cable is a true 50 ohm cable
> > rather than the RG58x variants, most of which are realy 52 ohm 
cables.
> > (51.5 0hm was (one of)the Mill specs back in the '40's and '50's)
> > 
> > Now that does not seem to be "too far off" the 50 ohm design, 
but at
> > higher frequencies it makes a lot of difference in the loss and
> > propagation in the cable. This is why a good quality RG8X is 
better in
> > some applications.
> > 
> > In duplex applications, the shielding is very important. This is 
why
> > the poorly shielded cables, such as RG8X, do not allways work 
well.
> > Using a double silver plated shielded cable like RG214 is 
perfered.
> >







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to