Skip:

I did look it up when I got home in my ancient M/A-COM
catalog (From 1982, no less.  It is hard to throw this stuff
away).

For those who are interested, the 7R011 is specified
at 125 watts.  The insertion loss is .9 db typical with
1.3 db max.  The isolation can be as high as 60
db with 50 db typical.  That may require breaking out
the HP435B and an RF head to tune it.  But I could get
a good null right down to zero indication at 10 watts in
and a 1 watt Bird element on the output and  expected
that I had at least 40 db or more of isolation.  It is
described as a metro style isolator.

The 44004 load that comes with the typical IM
panel that includes the 7R011 is rated at 100 watts
and I would agree with Skipp that it would not be a
good idea to dump more than 100 watts through the
device.  With 125 watts in and an insertion loss of
.9 db. there probably isn't more than 100 watts
in the dummy load, but you could be dissipating
a lot of power in heat in the isolator in an open
antenna condition.

Micheal Salem N5MS
Norman, Oklahoma



skipp025 wrote:
I would have to look it up, but I think that 
this isolator takes up to at least 100 watts.  
That would be when it is in resonance.
I have run 65 watts through it with not 
much trouble.
Micheal Salem

    

The port loads are under sized if you want real 
protection.  The units operate just fine at 100 
watts fwd power... at least that's what Motorola 
had been blowing through them for some decades. 

As long as the antenna system works as it should, 
the loads are probably ok for lower power levels. 

But I wouldn't trust the supplied port loads as 
a failsafe. 

skipp 



  








Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to