Don-
Now tell everyone about your experiences with the 7.06 Spectrum "ham grade"
repeater!!

KS0F

------ Original Message ------
Received: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:37:32 PM CDT
From: Don Jennings KI0EO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater-Builder antennas and other  products

> My experience,
>  My first VHF repeater on a really big tower and I installed one of 
> those "high gain dual band base/repeater antennas."
> Well static desense finally set in after a couple months, so I decided 
> to purchase a commercial grade DB products antenna for my ham repeater.
> I think the ham antenna was spec'd at 7 db gain and the commercial 
> antenna was an honest 3db gain DB 222 I think.
> Well, I had to finally take down the ham antenna before the new one 
> arrived, fiberglass was full of water, and so I mounted a quarter wave 
> mag mount
> on top of the building at the base of the tower while I waited for the 
> new antenna to arrive in a few weeks.
> Well the quarter wave antenna preformed almost as well as the dual band 
> up 175 ft higher.
> When the new antenna arrived WOW, what an increase in performance.
>  One of the local ham guys (works at a Moto shop) had always preached to 
> me about commercial grade antennas and was he right.
> Never again, I sigh every time I go work on some of the area ham 
> repeaters from the local ham clubs and see the antenna system.
> The argument usually always gets down to, well it has higher gain. A 
> quick question of how do you check for desense and that
> is where I usually stop talking, at that point it is useless.
> So ham antennas for repeaters, been there did that, not doing it again.
> 
> Don   KI0EO
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NĜATH wrote:
> 
> >Anytime I ever questioned this I was always told " The Antenna gain is
always set by the advertising department."
> >I think that must be fairly close to correct.
> >Dave / 
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> >Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 5:54 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater-Builder antennas and other
products
> >
> >
> >It is all in the rating.
> >The big guys use DBD (the way to go)
> >Many Ham grade antennas use DBi
> >or the new fake or made up DBC
> >Stick with DBD you will never go wrong!
> >If you note QST will not print an antenna gain unless
> >it is in DBD.
> >73 Russ,
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> >Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 5:44 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater-Builder antennas and other
products
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>One thing I've never been able to explain to people is: Why do the big
> >>    
> >>
> >Celwave, Sinclair, etc. "StationMaster" type antennas have only 5.2 dB
gain?
> >Actually, the 2-meter range ones are listed as typically having only 4.8
dB
> >gain, after putting the longer, lower-frequency elements in the 22' long
or
> >so radome.
> >  
> >
> >>The typical 5/8 wave mobile antennas have "3 dB gain", some of the
> >>    
> >>
> >"ham-grade" antennas claim 7-8 (and even 10 dB gain). I occasionally get
> >asked, why do you use one of those expensive, low-gain Sinclair, Celwave,
> >etc. antennas instead of Hustlers, Diamonds, etc that have so much more
> >gain? Even the big Scala OG-4 2-Meter antennas are 4 dB gain, if I
remember
> >correctly.
> >  
> >
> >>I've always been at a loss to explain, but having tried some of these
> >>    
> >>
> >amateur antennas, I see quite a performance difference (for the better, of
> >course) when I go back to using the "real" commercial-grade antennas.
> >  
> >
> >>I'm sure there must be something simple that I'm overlooking.
> >>
> >>LJ
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Scott Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Sent: May 13, 2005 1:45 PM
> >>To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> >>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater-Builder antennas and other
> >>    
> >>
> >products
> >  
> >
> >>Nope, Just me after a long week getting ready for Dayton. Try it again
> >>please.......
> >>
> >>http://www.repeater-builder.com/products/antennas.html
> >>
> >>Scott
> >>
> >>Scott Zimmerman
> >>Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
> >>612 Barnett Rd
> >>Boswell, PA 15531
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Dave VanHorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>;
<Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> >>Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 3:24 PM
> >>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater-Builder antennas and other
> >>    
> >>
> >products
> >  
> >
> >>    
> >>
> >>>At 01:39 PM 5/13/2005, KD5SFA wrote:
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>http://www.repeater-builder.com/products/antennas.html
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>Ah!  The SECRET antennas link.!
> >>>
> >>>Maybe that's why sales are down? :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >>>Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 5/10/2005
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to