Yep I even recall the Novice Class I had back in 1976 we were discussing the KC's , MC's to Khz. and Mhz. was on the exam probably.
Mark AB8RU [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Coy Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 12:18 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Poor Repeater RX > Good For you Joe! I too, went through the "cycles-per-second" to > Hertz transition. > To all else, > cycles-per-second = Hertz > Kilo cycles-per-second = KC = KiloHertz = KHz > Mega cycles-per-second = MC = MegaHertz = MHz > From this point add what ever prefix that applies. > Gee, What kind of table do you need? > My memory is not real good BUT I CAN remember "cycles-per-second = > Hertz" > 73 > AC0Y > --- In [email protected], "Joe Jarrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > This has to be OT for this group but the proper conversion would > be: > > > > KiloCycles per Second = KiloHertz. > > > > Unfortunately I'm old enough to remember "time before > KiloHertz" . . . . or maybe its fortunate I've lived to be that old. > > > > Joe K5FOG > > > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > > > On 5/21/2005 at 9:32 PM DCFluX wrote: > > > > >I've got a kiloCycle to kiloHertz conversion table you can study. > > > > > >On 5/21/05, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> KiloHertz is the correct term! > > >> > > >> Richard, N7TGB > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [email protected] > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DCFluX > > >> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:17 PM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX > > >> > > >> > > >> Don't you mean, kiloCycles? > > >> > > >> On 5/21/05, Kevin K. Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >------- Original Message ------- > > >> > >From : Eric Lemmon[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >Sent : 5/21/2005 4:05:15 PM > > >> > >To : [email protected] > > >> > >Cc : > > >> > >Subject : RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX > > >> > > > > >> > >Alexander, > > >> > > > > >> > >The > > >> > >Sinclair Q-202G duplexer can barely make 85 dB when tuned on > a network > > >> > >analyzer, so that's the major part of your desense problem. > It's only > > >a > > >> > >four-cavity duplexer, specified at 80 dB minimum isolation, > so no > > >amount > > >> > >of tuning is going to make it operate at an isolation above > its design > > >> > >limit. > > >> > > > >> > While I don't disagree with what has been written, please > realize that > > >> > *most* commercial manufacturers 'rate' their highband/2M > duplexer at > > >500 > > >> > kiloHertz split, not 600 kiloHertz where most amateur 2 meter > repeaters > > >> are > > >> > operated. This added frequency separation allows for the > duplexer to > > >> > provide more than the stated isolation at the 500 kiloHertz > > >specification. > > >> > > > >> > The Wacom WP-641 is specified at 85 dB of isolation at a 500 > kiloHertz > > >> > split, but provides 93 dB of isolation at 600 kiloHertz. The > Sinclair > > >> Q202G > > >> > is similar in its factory specifications, and isolation > provided. > > >> > > > >> > Kevin Custer > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > ________________________________ > > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > To visit your group on the web, go to: > > >> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ > > >> > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
