Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: What would be gained in a duplexer change: Curiosity

Thu, 26 May 2005 05:58:07 -0700

Well I will agree with that....Best class for that is the Chicken Band, love to play with the minds.  <grin>
 
Mathew


Chuck Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I was counting on another factor -- you tell someone you made a change
and then ask them if they notice. There's always someone that will say they
notice - even if you did nothing.

Chuck
WB2EDV



----- Original Message -----
From: "Laryn Lohman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:24 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: What would be gained in a duplexer change:
Curiosity


> --- In [email protected], "Chuck Kelsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> 99% of the users would never notice it, assuming that reducing the
> can count
>> didn't cause any desense.
>
> Not to argue your answer Chuck because you are absolutely right. I
> will go a step farther and say that 100% of your users will never
> notice such a small reduction in insertion loss. You've got it right
> Mathew, keep what you've got. You've got some extra insurance built in.
>
> Laryn K8TVZ
>






Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com






Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to