To paraphrase a saying: Birdies happen.
Yes, it may have been more smart to put it what is usually a repeater
input than an output. But, there are more expensive ham rigs with less
well placed birdies - such as on the UHF satellite band.
BTW, I too agree that the tight front end is a feature, not
a bug. It greatly helps reduce the chances of intermod/mixing.
Joe M.
DCFluX wrote:
>
> Yeah, It's one thing when the stuff in your house is doing it, but it
> is completely different when it is the radio its self. I don't care
> either way as I don't own a 202 anymore or like the crowd on the local
> 76 machine
>
> On 6/1/05, mch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are many devices that generate signals on 146.760 MHz. It's just a
> > fact of life - like cable TV interference on 145.250 MHz. At least the
> > latter can be solved easily. I've had interference on 146.760 MHz on my
> > radios since the late 70s with the release of the home PC.
> >
> > I would also debate that there are more repeaters on 146.760 MHz than
> > any other pair. Even so, it's only one repeater pair.
> >
> > Joe M.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
