At 08:03 AM 6/15/05, you wrote:
>Ken Arck wrote:
>
> > At 09:23 AM 6/15/2005 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> > If you're concern is mobile coverage in hilly terrain, go 2M, or better
> yet 6.
> >
> > <---Gee, are you saying that 800 Mhz trunking in such topography isn't a
> > good idea? LOL!
> >
> > Ken
> > (I lost count of all the public safety agencies who went to 800 trunking,
> > only to revert back to their good ol' VHF conventional system!)
>
>That's why I was surprised to hear WV went to UHF (from LB) for their
>state-wide system! I've driven through WV, even 2M dosen't get into some
>of those valleys.
>--
>Jim Barbour
>WD8CHL
Now you know why the California Highway Patrol is still on 42-43 mhz
(and when the LA County Sheriffs abandoned their 39mhz channels the
CHP snapped them up and are using them as repeater inputs).
Mike WA6ILQ
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
