At 10:45 AM 7/8/2005, Mathew Quaife wrote:
>Typically to say, there is nothing in this area as far as repeaters, 
>a few on 460 Mhz and one on VHF at 158 Mhz, other than the two cell 
>towers more than 5 miles away, that is about it.

This gets into an area that I need to understand better, "how do you 
know when it's "good enough"?"

How sensitive does a repeater receiver need to be?
How much isolation do I really need?
How much power should I be running?

All of the above, relative to an antenna, feedline length, mounting 
height, and terrain..
Around here, terrain means basically flat, and sites at 100-200' typically.

Radio mobile is good at plotting coverage maps, but then you get into 
what's the actual receiver like?
An HT has a pretty lame receiver, lame antenna, and puny transmitter, 
but I haven't really looked at those numbers to see if they are all 
proportional.
IOW, is the typical HT equally sad on receive, as transmit?
What about a mobile rig?

There's no sense in being an alligator, or a fruit bat, or spending 
power and money in cans you don't actually need.

In the can side, I think the answer is, as long as you aren't getting 
desense, you've got enough isolation.
You might add cans to get around a particular interference problem, 
like a nearby transmitter or receiver that is out of band, but still 
causing problems.

At one site, we used to have a 1kW VHF paging transmitter about a 
mile away, that put a very nice signal into the receiver, right 
through the cans.
But a stub filter took him out easily, since he was pretty far away (152-ish)

   





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to