I would say that the beam is likely below the vertical beamwidth of the
224, but how far below is each antenna?
I had a Butternet (Butternoodle is more like it) on a rotor, and I could
go from full scale to nothing by rotating it. It was anything but an
omni antenna. The 224 I would expect would be much more omni (reliable).
Joe M.
Mathew Quaife wrote:
>
> I wanted to see wht other's thought, or at least concerns. I have my
> repeater antenna at 92'. Below that is a 5 element beam, and below
> that is a 7 element tri-band beam on a 24' boom. Could this in anyway
> effect the pattern of the antenna, the slope patterns, ground effect,
> etc. Or would this not matter since it is a 1/2 wave dipole type
> antenna? Just for curious sake, since the question came up about
> coverage and dense area coverage in certain directions from the
> repeater site.
>
> Mathew
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
