... 

skipp025 wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps I did not make myself clear. The repeater
> > i am building will be nearly hi-fidelity audio and
> > such is why i intend to use tube equipment.
> 
> ZZZZZzzzzzzzz.....!  oop's  I fell asleep. A tube
> repeater gear means you're obviously not paying the
> utility bill.  An old GE EP-38 has got to run about
> $40 a month...  figure a GE Progress Line or Motorola
> Research Line has got to be min $50 a month. 

  How about an old 250BR? 

 
> > i worked in commercial 2 way radio in the 1960's and
> > worked in broadcasting in the 1970's. tube equipment
> > in highly  reliable if properly maintained, which i
> > can do. (i do admit that there are not to many of us
> > left that know how to properly maintain electronic
> > equipment.
> 
> I wouldn't say that...

  I wouldn't say that either ... 

 
> > i am setting this up to volunteer a system for
> > an group.
> 
> The "an group" will spend all its time working on
> the radio gear.

  Especially if all the insulation on the wiring has dried up 
 and is coming off. 

 
> > > Your training and preference are great for hi-fi
> > > audio equipment, but repeaters are optimized for
> > > weak signals with voice only,
> 
> You haven't been looking at the ctcss, dcs or ltr
> information have you..?

  ... yet ... 


 
> > > and as such, fidelity is no one of their strong
> > > points. 50 - 3500 Hz is about the limit, and the
> > > user radios will make it sound even worse.
> 
> They don't sound so bad to me... although my hearing
> suffers a bit from the 70's music level.

  I fondly remember those days ...  

 
> > > Today's solid-state communications equipment far
> > > surpasses the older tube stuff as far as reliability,
> > > durability, and ease of getting replacement parts when
> > > needed. A lot of today's radios don't even need to be
> > > tuned - they're wide-band but still quite selective
> > > and more sensitive than the tube radios ever could
> > > hope to be.
> 
> You're making my Motorola Sensicon Receiver mad...

  You need a diagram for it ... yet? 

 
> > > There's a ton of good repeater-building information
> > > over on www.repeater-builder.com and you would spend
> > > less time reading it than you would trying to make
> > > those old U43GG? radios perform the continuous duty
> > > cycle required of repeaters.
> > >
> > > Bob M.
> 
> Simple... self abuse.   But he can have the old RCA Carfone
> Base in my storage unit if he wanted to truck it home...
> Only takes a forklift to move it...
> 
> skipp

  Neil





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to