Gee it seems to me that if you have two radios you have the makings of a link. Just pitch a small controller and a two beams at it, with some seperation and as little power as you can get away with and it would likely work okay in an EMERGENCY.
--- In [email protected], Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul Holm wrote: > > In this particular situation, the users don't need to hear each other. This > > will be used for running a Skywarn net on two repeaters which are not > > linked. Only the net control station needs to hear everyone. Users will be > > trained to expect this format. > > If there's ever a situation where there's no one at all on repeater #2 > and the Net controller is gabbering away at people on repeater #1... > > The Net Controller isn't communicating with anyone on repeater #2, thus > making multiple one-way transmissions on Repeater #2... thus, illegal. > > Unless you're going to claim all of his half-conversation transmissions > to people on Repeater #1 going out also over Repeater #2 are QST's... > > I don't think that'd hold up to any reasonable amount of scrutiny. > > I also wouldn't want to be out in the field watching tornadoes wondering > if the Net controller was going to hear me or the other guy when two of > us have emergencies on both repeaters at the same time. > > Run two proper Nets or link the repeaters. The other way appears to be > both illegal and dangerous for your participants. > > Nate WY0X > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
