Laryn,

That's a very good question!  When we speak of "notch duplexers" we usually
mean a mobile duplexer, which usually comprises six helical resonators that
are about 1" square.  The coupling loops or probes are usually fixed at the
factory, and the longitudinal tuning screws simply move the notch.  The pass
insertion loss is more or less fixed by the design of the duplexer, and is
extremely broad.  Most such duplexers are intended for splits of 5 MHz or
greater.

The design of a BpBr duplexer, especially one for 2m application, sacrifices
a sharp bandpass response so that the notch can be deep enough at a narrow
split- 600 kHz at 2m.  At a solitary site, the typical BpBr duplexer will
probably work just fine.  It's when there are other transmitters nearby that
problems occur.  The "modest" bandpass response of a 2m BpBr duplexer may
not be tight enough to shut out nearby transmitters that cause desense.
That's exactly the situation where additional bandpass-only filtering is
necessary.

I have one 40 watt MTR2000 2m repeater at a site at which the only other
emitter is a 10,000 watt FM broadcast station.  The duplexer is a Sinclair
Q-202G unit that I tuned on a network analyzer.  The repeater had
significant desense until I put one 8" bandpass cavity set for 1.0 dB IL on
the receive side, between the duplexer RX output and the receiver.  With no
preamp, the desense went away, and the repeater has phenomenal sensitivity
and range.

Your comment that the additional pass cavity loss is nil, might be overly
optimistic.  Truth be told, two pass cavities set for 0.5 dB IL are
significantly better than one cavity at 1.0 dB.  Lower IL means a much
broader response.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laryn Lohman
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 7:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer questions

--- In [email protected], "Eric Lemmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>  
> The names are somewhat misleading, because the bandpass effect is
relatively
> modest, although the notch is quite sharp.  It is a good idea to
have a pure
> bandpass cavity or two between the duplexer and the receiver,
especially if
> you have a preamplifier.

Eric, I agree with that.  Since the bandpass effect is so modest, and
since an additional bandpass cavity or two will probably be needed
anyway, why are BpBr duplexers considered to be so important at a busy
site, compared to say- a notch duplexer???  It seems notch duplexers
are automatically considered to be almost a useless item when the
subject of duplexers is discussed here, and should (almost) never be
used.  The additional loss of that pass cavity is nil.  Comments Eric
or anyone?

Laryn K8TVZ








 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to