Bill,
         There are many approaches but for simplicity and if cost is 
not an issue, Dedicated Auxiliary Receivers like GE Mastr II or 
Motorola Spectra TAC with 600 ohm line outs and voting tone cards are 
tough to beat. Connected by dedicated phone lines to the voter ( most 
all are good to excellent, but my choice for simplicity in setup is 
the 4ch Hall Voter from Doug Hall ) at the TX site, and driving a 
transmitter keying panel to bring up the tx or direct keying if you 
choose is as stock an answer in the commercial world as you can 
get....( Moto and M/A-Com would recommend their voter however :-) )

There are MANY derivatives which mostly are done to control costs 
like rf links instead of phone lines... all add technical complexity 
with ctcss etc, and cw iding in the link band setting off another 
whole sets of issues....

The technology of implementing the voter cost effectively is where 
issues tend to pop up..... The basic concept is the same as it was in 
the 60's....

That being said, unless it is a sole source bid or you are 
independently wealthy, costs are ALWAYS an issue, so full period 
TELCO lines need to be replaced by less costly resources like rf 
links.... more expensive initially, cheaper in the long run...and 
component selection can greatly influence deployment issues.

Some of the most stable voting systems I am aware of use GE Mastr II 
stations and receivers linked with GE MVP's modified as cross band 
repeaters, with some care to audio levels, ctcss processing and 
emphasis/de-emphasis redundancy.... When done right, they sound 
excellent and perform for years without maintenance.

Doug
KD8B



At 12:04 PM 4/22/2006, you wrote:
>Recognizing that there may be more than one answer (or NO simple 
>answer), I would appreciate the group's point of view on the best 
>hardware for a voter system, based on the following criteria:
>
>    * Performance
>    * Reliability
>    * Ease of implementation
>Note that, for the purposes of this analysis, cost is NOT a consideration.
>
>In case you're wondering why, our club is well into a 
>labor-intensive implementation of low-end equipment which has not gone well.
>
>Bill W2ET
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----------
>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>    *  Visit your group 
> "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder>Repeater-Builder" on the web.
>    *
>    *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    * 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
>    *
>    *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the 
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>----------






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to